Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: − + − + + + + + + + + + + +
two reasons for starters (1) methodology (2) unreliable http://www.iraqbodycount.org/background.php
==Casualties==
==Casualties==
According to the US Department of Defense, over 3,200 U.S. troops have died in the war.<ref>[http://www.defenselink.mil Department of Defense]</ref> According to the [[Iraq body Count Project]], over 60,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the start of the war, a large number by the insurgents.<ref>[http://iraqbodycount.org Iraq Body Count Project]</ref>
According to the US Department of Defense, over 3,200 U.S. troops have died in the war.<ref>[http://www.defenselink.mil Department of Defense]</ref>
<b>Enemy Casualties</b>
<b>Enemy Casualties</b>
Larry Schweikart, Professor of History at the University of Dayton has calculated that, "<b>a low estimate is that we have removed from the order of battle about 210,000 on the low end to 360,000 on the high end. This is an entire generation of jihadists</b>, and will, if nothing else, significantly feminize Muslim society." <ref> http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=7673_0_1_0_M </ref>
According to Bob Parks in his Mar 28, 07 piece <b><i>Iraq: We Ain't Losing</i></b> "In war, the traditional way of gauging who is winning or not is, unfortunately, a count of battlefield casualties. We have everyone from activists to actors to congressmen and women to pundits all telling us how many of our servicemen and women have died in Iraq and Afghanistan. People keep score in blogs and even on the sides of their homes, yet we never hear the one number that may put at ease, for some, the sacrifice made by our sons and daughters. <b>How many of the enemy have we killed? A simple question.</b>
The answer came from Larry Schweikart, Professor of History at the University of Dayton who sent Mr. Parks the following:
Last August, President Bush invited me and a few other military historians to spend an hour with him in the Oval Office. When I brought up this “enemy dead” issue, he shook his head and said, “I’m afraid since Vietnam and the ‘body counts’ we really can’t even use this as a measuring stick [as far as the public was concerned].” It was a sad commentary on how out of whack things got---especially if you think (as I do) that not all Muslims are terrorists. That means there are a finite number, and we have to be getting pretty close to the bottom of the barrel.
Since then, I’ve updated the numbers with refinements and calculate that a low estimate of 30,000 terrorists have been killed since 9/11, and an upperbound number of 60,000. On top of that, between 120 and 240,000 terrorists have been wounded. This is where it gets tricky. Likely because their medicine isn’t as good as ours, they have a higher death rate among wounded, which probably means that instead of 1 out of 8 dying of wounds, it’s more like 3 out of 8, and that number is in my first set of stats. In addition, we have captured close to 50,000 terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq since 9/11, and since the beginning of hostilities in Iraq, using traditional desertion rates, I figure at least another 10,000 jihadists have put away the old IED and gone home.
<b>So, a low estimate is that we have removed from the order of battle about 210,000 on the low end to 360,000 on the high end. This is an entire generation of jihadists</b>, and will, if nothing else, significantly feminize Muslim society. So those who wish to tell our nation, and the world, that we are losing the war on terror are living a lie. Those who wish to use our soldiers for political gain are no better than those shooting at them on the ground. Number don’t lie. People do.
http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=7673_0_1_0_M
==References==
==References==