Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + +
the climate reconstruction of Mann passed both peer review rounds of the IPCC without anyone ever really having checked it.
A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff. This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]].
A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff. This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]].
==Abuses by the IPCC==
:"...the climate reconstruction of {{Lhs|Michael|Mann}} passed both peer review rounds of the IPCC without anyone ever really having checked it." [http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/system/old/GrassrootPerspective/HockeyStickScandal.shtml]
==Limitations of peer review==
==Limitations of peer review==