11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 189:
Line 189: + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)
Revision as of 14:16, February 26, 2010
, 14:16, February 26, 2010→The gravity question
:::: My statement is not merely at "first glance ... the most logical deduction." It is the ''only'' logical deduction. It is true with a mathematical certainty, which is why the denial of it is so illustrative of a closed mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:40, 25 February 2010 (EST)
:::: My statement is not merely at "first glance ... the most logical deduction." It is the ''only'' logical deduction. It is true with a mathematical certainty, which is why the denial of it is so illustrative of a closed mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:40, 25 February 2010 (EST)
::::: You accuse ME of having a closed mind because I actually looked for evidence? The evidence might not be what you want it to be, but that doesn't make it less true. 2.00000001 will crash the planets into the sun, that's a mathematical and physical fact. I dare you to test it with a simulation, that would really show how open minded you are. Also admitting you're wrong is part of being open minded. I'm correct. Run the tests and admit it. You're so proud of your open mind, this shouldn't be a difficult task, now would it? Really mr Schlafly, run the simulation. As I said, I doubted my teacher so with my open mind I immediatly did some tests. And they confirmed what I learned. Sometimes logical deductions are simply wrong.[[User:Marnick|Marnick]] 09:16, 26 February 2010 (EST)
==Unclear questions==
==Unclear questions==