Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:  
::::I can agree with that. But ''why'' "change" how Obama's article is titled when others are titled either without their middle name or with their middle name if they are commonly known and identified by the name, in some cases. Simply changing something doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, there has to be reason, and the reason has to be, well, reasonable. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 14:44, 27 February 2010 (EST)
 
::::I can agree with that. But ''why'' "change" how Obama's article is titled when others are titled either without their middle name or with their middle name if they are commonly known and identified by the name, in some cases. Simply changing something doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, there has to be reason, and the reason has to be, well, reasonable. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 14:44, 27 February 2010 (EST)
 
:::::Call it the price of progress.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:17, 27 February 2010 (EST)
 
:::::Call it the price of progress.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:17, 27 February 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
I have always wondered why the Obamabots get so upset with the name Obama's parents chose.  Pretty silly. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 27 February 2010 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu