nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: − + + +
Debate:Relationship between Socialism and athletic performance (view source)
Revision as of 10:08, March 1, 2010
, 10:08, March 1, 2010→Conservapedia Leads....Others Follow!
This is yet another case of Conservapedia being ahead of the curve. Andy, you were spot-on, as usual. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:24, 28 February 2010 (EST)
This is yet another case of Conservapedia being ahead of the curve. Andy, you were spot-on, as usual. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:24, 28 February 2010 (EST)
: TK - you realize that link proves exactly the opposite of what you want it to, right? It says that since certain countries have moved to the free market, they have won proportionally '''fewer''' medals than they did under communism. [[User:RobertE|RobertE]] 23:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
:TK - you realize that link proves exactly the opposite of what you want it to, right? It says that since certain countries have moved to the free market, they have won proportionally '''fewer''' medals than they did under communism. [[User:RobertE|RobertE]] 23:48, 28 February 2010 (EST)
::What I know is you think that, but should perhaps re-read the parts about how America and non-socialist nations are on the ascendancy! Try the "pie" charts....they might be less challenging. Try as hard as you want, you simply cannot disprove Andy's original premise...because the truth will indeed set you free! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 05:08, 1 March 2010 (EST)