Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 245:
Line 245: + +
→Where the controversy is - and what it's about: Starting to lost the train of thought here. Maybe it's the clam chowder I just had?
Ed, as you have generally been a fairly moderate voice of reason, perhaps you can mediate a bit. THe whole "evolutionists promote this idea, see this NYT article" should go, as well as the rest of the little debate, and moved elsewhere (not deleted from CP). We should go with the simple definitions above. IMHO.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:11, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Ed, as you have generally been a fairly moderate voice of reason, perhaps you can mediate a bit. THe whole "evolutionists promote this idea, see this NYT article" should go, as well as the rest of the little debate, and moved elsewhere (not deleted from CP). We should go with the simple definitions above. IMHO.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:11, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:Well, what does our [[scientific method]] article say about theories and explanations, hypotheses and falsifiablity, drawing corallary conclusions and testing them against observations?