Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
227 bytes added ,  03:54, March 7, 2010
We welcome your informative edits that the liberals at Wikipedia censor. Do the Wikipedians really think they can ignore conservative truths just be censoring them?
Line 26: Line 26:     
Please be careful to take the correct version of your original work; we don't want any fuss over alleged violations of free licensed work. I assume you know that your contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors '''BUT''' that the [[derivative work]] thereby created is '''NOT''' free licensed. Call it a quirk, but Mr. Schlafly has a good reason for it. (If you can't leave with these terms, let us know immediately.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:00, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Please be careful to take the correct version of your original work; we don't want any fuss over alleged violations of free licensed work. I assume you know that your contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors '''BUT''' that the [[derivative work]] thereby created is '''NOT''' free licensed. Call it a quirk, but Mr. Schlafly has a good reason for it. (If you can't leave with these terms, let us know immediately.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:00, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
We welcome your informative edits that the liberals at Wikipedia censor.  Do the Wikipedians really think they can ignore conservative truths just be censoring them?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:54, 6 March 2010 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits

Navigation menu