Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
49 bytes added ,  18:06, March 8, 2010
Line 256: Line 256:  
::To ThePantsMobile: you're not quite correct there actually. It's too simple to say Communism and Nazism are polar opposites. In fact, they have lots of things in common - one-party states, a monopoly of the means of communication, extensive surveillance, subjugation of the individual, etc. ''Economically speaking'', they are polar opposites. However, ''socially speaking'' they are very similar. A straight line with Communism at one end and Nazism at the other isn't very accurate, perhaps a horseshoe with them at either end would be better.
 
::To ThePantsMobile: you're not quite correct there actually. It's too simple to say Communism and Nazism are polar opposites. In fact, they have lots of things in common - one-party states, a monopoly of the means of communication, extensive surveillance, subjugation of the individual, etc. ''Economically speaking'', they are polar opposites. However, ''socially speaking'' they are very similar. A straight line with Communism at one end and Nazism at the other isn't very accurate, perhaps a horseshoe with them at either end would be better.
   −
To RobS: True, he is POV, but isn't that the point of Conservapedia? To be POV (though of course promoting a conservative viewpoint)?
+
::To RobS: True, he is POV, but isn't that the point of Conservapedia? To be POV (though of course promoting a conservative viewpoint)? [[User:Blake|Blake]] 13:06, 8 March 2010 (EST)
    
== Unbelievably Hypocritical ==
 
== Unbelievably Hypocritical ==
8

edits

Navigation menu