Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎How are these words conservative?: working with ''findlaw''
Line 65: Line 65:     
:::::: Yes, and some results are noted in the table.  Of course, some of the words are self-evidently conservative (e.g., "conservative" or "self-defense"), and other words are unlikely to ever appear in a Supreme Court opinion (e.g., "action-at-a-distance").--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:50, 2 March 2010 (EST)
 
:::::: Yes, and some results are noted in the table.  Of course, some of the words are self-evidently conservative (e.g., "conservative" or "self-defense"), and other words are unlikely to ever appear in a Supreme Court opinion (e.g., "action-at-a-distance").--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:50, 2 March 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::Thank you! I found the examples - and did a quick check myself, using [http://www.findlaw.com/CaseCode/supreme.html findlaw]. It's quite cumbersome to check a word and - in a second step - find out who of the judges used it. It would be nice to have the opinions in txt-format, sorted by political affiliation: then, one could even search for new words!  [[User:PhilG|PhilG]] 13:15, 10 March 2010 (EST)
    
== Dramacast? ==
 
== Dramacast? ==
47

edits

Navigation menu