| Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| | ==Poverty standards== | | ==Poverty standards== |
| | | | |
| − | The level at which a person or group is considered to be living in poverty is largely relative, and the ways in which they are impoverished can vary. A person who would be judged to be living in poverty in the West, in particular in the [[United States]], would typically be considered rich by [[third world]] standards. Yet a person living in poverty in most undeveloped countries would be considered to be far better off than most in a country like [[North Korea]]. | + | The level at which a person or group is considered to be living in poverty is largely relative, and the ways in which they are impoverished can vary. A person who would be judged to be living in poverty in the West, in particular in the [[United States]], would typically be considered rich by [[Third World]] standards. And yet a person living in poverty in most undeveloped countries would typically be considered to be far better off than most in a country like [[North Korea]]. The highest cost of living aspect for a person living in poverty in a Western country would often be housing, while for a Third World resident it could easily be food. |
| | | | |
| | As far back as 2004, of households defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, forty-six percent owned their own homes, with only six percent being overcrowded, seventy-six percent had air conditioning, almost seventy five percent owned a car, with thirty percent owning two or more cars. Ninety-seven percent had a color television, with over half owning two or more color televisions, with 62 percent having cable or satellite TV reception, while seventy-eight percent also possessed a VCR or DVD player. Seventy-three percent owned a microwave oven, and a third had an automatic dishwasher. | | As far back as 2004, of households defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, forty-six percent owned their own homes, with only six percent being overcrowded, seventy-six percent had air conditioning, almost seventy five percent owned a car, with thirty percent owning two or more cars. Ninety-seven percent had a color television, with over half owning two or more color televisions, with 62 percent having cable or satellite TV reception, while seventy-eight percent also possessed a VCR or DVD player. Seventy-three percent owned a microwave oven, and a third had an automatic dishwasher. |
| | | | |
| − | However, poverty covers a wide spectrum of income levels in the United States, and includes those who have little of the above, none at all.<ref>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/BG1713es.cfm</ref> | + | However, what constitutes poverty covers a wide spectrum of income levels in the United States, and includes the smaller percentages of people who have little of the above.<ref>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/BG1713es.cfm</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | According to the Brookings Institution, in 2008 more than 30 percent of the nation’s population ( 91.6 million) were below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Western cities and Florida suburbs were among the first to see significant increases in poverty between 2007 and 2008.<ref>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2010/0120_poverty_kneebone.aspx?p=1</ref> |
| | | | |
| | Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, reported that President Obama's administration plans to create a new index of poverty, in which poverty would be determined comparatively, the level of which would increase as the income of all in one's country increases. | | Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, reported that President Obama's administration plans to create a new index of poverty, in which poverty would be determined comparatively, the level of which would increase as the income of all in one's country increases. |
| Line 41: |
Line 43: |
| | | | |
| | He notes that this would have the effect of statistically ensuring that “the poor will always be with you” (Mark 14:7), no matter how much better off they get in absolute terms.<ref>[http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=ZGY1OWZhZGY1NjM3MGUzMzdjNjc2MjAwNzExZWEyOTE www.nationalreview.com, ''New ‘Poverty’ Measurement''], March 8, 2010 4:00 A.M.</ref> | | He notes that this would have the effect of statistically ensuring that “the poor will always be with you” (Mark 14:7), no matter how much better off they get in absolute terms.<ref>[http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=ZGY1OWZhZGY1NjM3MGUzMzdjNjc2MjAwNzExZWEyOTE www.nationalreview.com, ''New ‘Poverty’ Measurement''], March 8, 2010 4:00 A.M.</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | This in turn, works to justify expansion of liberal [[socialist]] polices. |
| | | | |
| | == References == | | == References == |