59
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 114:
Line 114: + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 12:43, March 20, 2010
, 12:43, March 20, 2010→Why use KJV?
Also, what I am not clear on is why when it stated that original translation did not include a verse (exp. Father, forgive them, they no not what they do), why is the original translation not listed. And besides if some of these were true and in the oldest texts didn't include the stories or the verses then most translation would now have them bracketed (exp of Ethoiopian eunich being taken into the water to be baptized).[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:17, 10 March 2010 (EST)
Also, what I am not clear on is why when it stated that original translation did not include a verse (exp. Father, forgive them, they no not what they do), why is the original translation not listed. And besides if some of these were true and in the oldest texts didn't include the stories or the verses then most translation would now have them bracketed (exp of Ethoiopian eunich being taken into the water to be baptized).[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:17, 10 March 2010 (EST)
KJV is in public domain. But it is still a rather poor choice. The translators of KJV added in some extra verses, and who knows, they may have had a liberal bias themselves! I think to avoid any bias we should work from the Greek like the professionals do. Always handle the Word of God with care. [[User:NP|NP]]