1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − + + + + + + + +
Talk:Atheism and Mass Murder (view source)
Revision as of 23:35, March 21, 2010
, 23:35, March 21, 2010no edit summary
Personally, I found Malirin's contribution to this passage to be rather valid, and especially the first paragraph struck me as particularly well-written. The second paragraph could have used better wording. But to see this whole passage reverted with just a "Who cares what liberals think" saddens me. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 22:05, 26 February 2010 (EST)
Personally, I found Malirin's contribution to this passage to be rather valid, and especially the first paragraph struck me as particularly well-written. The second paragraph could have used better wording. But to see this whole passage reverted with just a "Who cares what liberals think" saddens me. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 22:05, 26 February 2010 (EST)
:Conservapedia is not a dumping ground for liberal and atheist apologetics and excuses. If readers ''really'' want that, they can head on over to wikipedia and drink their fill. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 22:46, 26 February 2010 (EST)
:Conservapedia is not a dumping ground for liberal and atheist apologetics and excuses. If readers ''really'' want that, they can head on over to wikipedia and drink their fill. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 22:46, 26 February 2010 (EST
==Defamation==
Does it not occur to anyone that to suggest that to suggest that atheists are more likely to kill masses of people is offensive? Hitler was a very sick man, and everyone knows that, but it doesn't mean that every atheist is as sick as that. It is also constantly asserted that to disagree with this article means that the person disagreeing is automatically dumping their liberal agenda. There are plenty of religious liberal persons, as there are non-religious conservatives.
It must also be mentioned that there have been MANY killers of masses that were religious.
--[[User:thedrunkencat|thedrunkencat]]