66
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
no edit summary
::This issue is spreading to three talk pages, sorry about that. But if a coroner severed the hands '''only''' to get ID and '''not''' to intimidate, that's one POV. I'd like to find out if that is a normal practice, and how that differs legally from [[mutilation]] (generally considered a crime). Can you and Radh work together on this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 20 March 2010 (EDT)
::This issue is spreading to three talk pages, sorry about that. But if a coroner severed the hands '''only''' to get ID and '''not''' to intimidate, that's one POV. I'd like to find out if that is a normal practice, and how that differs legally from [[mutilation]] (generally considered a crime). Can you and Radh work together on this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 20 March 2010 (EDT)
:::It is a bit strange, that the corpse could not be identified, if, as is said, some of the FBI agents present knew her - she also had been in custody recently. But intimidation has not been mentioned on the webpages I have seen (perhaps a third). 2.) The fact that the first coroner did not notice the damage from the bullet to the neck/back of head seems nearly unbelievable, but similar things happen even in my "Prussian" country. 3.) Strangely, this suspected "cover-up" did not work, because of the second autopsy, which Aquash's daughters got with the help of AIM (it is said). So AIM activity led to their implication (that AIM members did it is now common sense, even on AIM members' sites) in this.--[[User:Radh|Radh]] 07:47, 22 March 2010 (EDT)