Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
without a recall mechanism, there is no way for the people to substitute representation in place of an incapacitated official who refuses to resign
Line 6: Line 6:  
*recall elections provide greater accountability, which is desirable
 
*recall elections provide greater accountability, which is desirable
 
*without a recall mechanism, there is no check and balance on contempt by the public official for the people
 
*without a recall mechanism, there is no check and balance on contempt by the public official for the people
−
*without a recall mechanism, there is no way for the people to deal with an incapacitated official who refuses to resign
+
*without a recall mechanism, there is no way for the people to substitute representation in place of an incapacitated official who refuses to resign
 
*recall elections have been very successful when used, as in recalling a California Chief Justice (Bird) and Governor (Davis), and a corrupt North Dakota Governor (in 1921)
 
*recall elections have been very successful when used, as in recalling a California Chief Justice (Bird) and Governor (Davis), and a corrupt North Dakota Governor (in 1921)
 
*recall elections are the only meaningful deterrent against lying by candidates during campaigns, or candidates switching parties after election
 
*recall elections are the only meaningful deterrent against lying by candidates during campaigns, or candidates switching parties after election
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Navigation menu