Changes

Talk:Essay:Why Recall Elections Are Essential (view source)

Revision as of 21:38, March 22, 2010

577 bytes added , 21:38, March 22, 2010

Line 12: Line 12:

That being the case, why is there controversy about this at all? What legal justification is there for mounting such a challenge? --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:03, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

+

:I agree with you completely, Ben, and particularly appreciate your historical knowledge of this. In fact, I may incorporate your historical point about states "gradually moving away from appointment and towards direct election" into a future brief on this. Further migration towards recall fits perfectly into the historical parttern!

+

:In response to your question, even the [[WSJ]] claims a recall is unconstitutional, and others (especially Menendez!) claim likewise. I expect this issue will be appealed up to the U.S. Supreme Court.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]

== Essay? ==

This article is as encyclopedic as any within Conservapedia, and it represents a conservative POV, which is our mission. Why then is it placed in the Essay name space? I suggest it be moved to Main Space. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:22, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,196

edits

Changes

Talk:Essay:Why Recall Elections Are Essential (view source)

Revision as of 21:38, March 22, 2010

Navigation menu

Search