Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
→ObamaCare: added after the vote info
Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis. <ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis. <ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
An arrogant Stupak holds a press conference after the successful vote for universal healthcare in which he shames [[Republican]]s and touts pro-life Democrats. "Republicans don't want to cover 32 million uninsured," “The Executive Order will have the full force of law.” Which is in fact a bold face lie. It was such a bad deal that Susan B. Anthony List rescinded its' “Defender of Life” award to Stupak. <ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/22/stupaks-deal-enforceable-or-empty/ Stupak’s Deal: Enforceable or Empty?, Fox news, March 22, 2010]</ref>
==See Also==
==See Also==