Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good suggestion, but the First Amendment is so vast and important that one entry would not do it justice. The church issues are really different from the free speech issues.
Line 78: Line 78:     
I realize that there is also a [[First Amendment]] page as well as a [[Establishment clause]]. My additions to this article of major establishment cases would go in the latter, but I would suggest that this page and the Establishment clause be sections of the First Amendment page. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 15:28, 23 March 2010 (EDT)
 
I realize that there is also a [[First Amendment]] page as well as a [[Establishment clause]]. My additions to this article of major establishment cases would go in the latter, but I would suggest that this page and the Establishment clause be sections of the First Amendment page. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 15:28, 23 March 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Good suggestion, but the [[First Amendment]] is so vast and important that one entry would not do it justice.  The church issues are really different from the free speech issues.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:41, 23 March 2010 (EDT)
    
==Purpose==
 
==Purpose==
    
Is it to protect religion from government interference, or to shield government from religious influence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:54, 20 January 2010 (EST)
 
Is it to protect religion from government interference, or to shield government from religious influence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:54, 20 January 2010 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu