43
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + +
Talk:Essay:Why Recall Elections Are Essential (view source)
Revision as of 15:09, March 24, 2010
, 15:09, March 24, 2010→Seventeenth Amendment
:In response to your question, even the [[WSJ]] claims a recall is unconstitutional, and others (especially Menendez!) claim likewise. I expect this issue will be appealed up to the U.S. Supreme Court.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
:In response to your question, even the [[WSJ]] claims a recall is unconstitutional, and others (especially Menendez!) claim likewise. I expect this issue will be appealed up to the U.S. Supreme Court.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
::I'm genuinely curious, couldn't the legislative body of NJ just pass a law that makes it clear that this is a legal procedure. It seems that in moving away from appointment they must have passed laws that defined how an election works and looks. Isn't this a more preferable option to what could be called activism on the part of judges? Unless, it isn't an option, because of the particular feelings of the people of New Jersey.
== Essay? ==
== Essay? ==