Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + + +
→Excellent delete on "Poe's Law": new section
On the "hypocrisy" thing, I wanted to let you know I wasn't talking saying Conservapedia was hypocritical, I was saying that we can't stoop down to [[Liberal hypocrisy]]. [[User:NP|NP]]
On the "hypocrisy" thing, I wanted to let you know I wasn't talking saying Conservapedia was hypocritical, I was saying that we can't stoop down to [[Liberal hypocrisy]]. [[User:NP|NP]]
:Right, I get that. You were saying it would be hypocritical to condemn Rahm Emmanuel for using the same terms Rush Limbaugh uses. I was pointing out it wasn't because the White House and talk radio are very different venues. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 22:47, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
:Right, I get that. You were saying it would be hypocritical to condemn Rahm Emmanuel for using the same terms Rush Limbaugh uses. I was pointing out it wasn't because the White House and talk radio are very different venues. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 22:47, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
== Excellent delete on "Poe's Law" ==
It's nothing more than an internet meme for a small percentage of atheists. 99% of people would have no idea what it is. We don't need to afford it any legitimacy here. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 16:12, 24 March 2010 (EDT)