Changes

::::Note how I put 'agenda' and 'pushing' in quotes?  That's because I have no agenda to push.  Only you seem to think I do.  You seem to suggest they only break the rules to make this place 'more conservative'.  Well, I'll take an example.  The page on Jesus.  At one point, the page began by stating that Christians believe that Jesus Christ is the only Son of God.  It has been changed, more than once, to 'Jesus Christ is the only Son of God' by sysops.  That is in clear breach of commandment 5 - 'do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry', as they are deleting the FACT that Christians believe this to be true and replacing it with the OPINION that it is definitely true.  This has nothing whatsoever to do with making it more conservative, and everything to do with making it more Christian fundamentalist.  Whilst many conservatives are Christian, not all are, and, indeed, most Christians can tell the difference between verifiable fact and something that is opinion - even if it happens to be an opinion they share, and have an unshakeable belief they're right to believe.  [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 22:57, 18 December 2007 (EST)

::::Note how I put 'agenda' and 'pushing' in quotes?  That's because I have no agenda to push.  Only you seem to think I do.  You seem to suggest they only break the rules to make this place 'more conservative'.  Well, I'll take an example.  The page on Jesus.  At one point, the page began by stating that Christians believe that Jesus Christ is the only Son of God.  It has been changed, more than once, to 'Jesus Christ is the only Son of God' by sysops.  That is in clear breach of commandment 5 - 'do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry', as they are deleting the FACT that Christians believe this to be true and replacing it with the OPINION that it is definitely true.  This has nothing whatsoever to do with making it more conservative, and everything to do with making it more Christian fundamentalist.  Whilst many conservatives are Christian, not all are, and, indeed, most Christians can tell the difference between verifiable fact and something that is opinion - even if it happens to be an opinion they share, and have an unshakeable belief they're right to believe.  [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 22:57, 18 December 2007 (EST)

:::::Dude, there's a book called "The Bubble", and around these parts it's undeniably true.  You don't have to say "Christians believe..." because this site has the Bubble as an authoritative source.  If you can't accept the Bubble as a given truth, then you're not going to do well here at all. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 23:13, 18 December 2007 (EST)

:::::Dude, there's a book called "The Bible", and around these parts it's undeniably true.  You don't have to say "Christians believe..." because this site has the Bible as an authoritative source.  If you can't accept the Bible as a given truth, then you're not going to do well here at all. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 23:13, 18 December 2007 (EST)

::::::Unless you can provide absolute, conclusive proof that the Bible is true, then stating anything as fact that only has the Bible as a source is opinion, not fact.  The Bible MAY be true, it may not be, I don't know - and neither do you.  You may fervently believe it's true, but, unless you have verifiable evidence of this, that is only your belief and opinion, not fact.  [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:27, 18 December 2007 (EST)

::::::Unless you can provide absolute, conclusive proof that the Bible is true, then stating anything as fact that only has the Bible as a source is opinion, not fact.  The Bible MAY be true, it may not be, I don't know - and neither do you.  You may fervently believe it's true, but, unless you have verifiable evidence of this, that is only your belief and opinion, not fact.  [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:27, 18 December 2007 (EST)