1,590
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 371:
Line 371: + + + +
→Small change to reflect trends in American liberalism?: new section
At the end of the first paragraph, the article states "and in Europe even socialistic." While I don't believe that [[America]] is as close to a socialistic perversion as Europe, I think our ''liberals'' are. Does anyone object if I add this or make this sentence emphasize that? I don't want to remove "in Europe" because I feel that makes it too general; any suggestions on how we could make this reflect that American liberals are increasingly socialistic as well? Thank you! [[User:Tzoran|Tzoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 21:57, 12 April 2010 (EDT)
At the end of the first paragraph, the article states "and in Europe even socialistic." While I don't believe that [[America]] is as close to a socialistic perversion as Europe, I think our ''liberals'' are. Does anyone object if I add this or make this sentence emphasize that? I don't want to remove "in Europe" because I feel that makes it too general; any suggestions on how we could make this reflect that American liberals are increasingly socialistic as well? Thank you! [[User:Tzoran|Tzoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 21:57, 12 April 2010 (EDT)
== Small change to reflect trends in American liberalism? ==
At the end of the first paragraph, the article states "and in Europe even socialistic." While I don't believe that [[America]] is as close to a socialistic perversion as Europe, I think our ''liberals'' are. Does anyone object if I add this or make this sentence emphasize that? I don't want to remove "in Europe" because I feel that makes it too general; any suggestions on how we could make this reflect that American liberals are increasingly socialistic as well? Thank you! [[User:Tzoran|Tzoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 21:58, 12 April 2010 (EDT)