128
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − In '''''Brendlin v. California''''', 127 S. Ct. 2400 (2007), a unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a passenger in a car stopped for a traffic check has a [[Fourth Amendment]] right against unlawful seizure. The passenger "was seized from the moment [the driver]'s car came to a halt on the side of the road, and it was error to deny his suppression motion on the ground that seizure occurred only at the formal arrest."+ − − Justice [[David Souter]], writing for the Court, reasoned that a reasonable passenger would not feel free to leave from such a stop. The Court held that: − − :"When a police officer makes a traffic stop, the driver of the car is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The question in this case is whether the same is true of a passenger. We hold that a passenger is seized as well and so may challenge the constitutionality of the stop. − − As a result, the seizure of methamphetamine paraphernalia may be suppressed from evidence if found to be lacking in adequate cause for the search under the [[Fourth Amendment]]. − [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Replaced content with 'blah blah blah'
blah blah blah