Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + +
Talk:Intelligence testing (view source)
Revision as of 13:07, March 31, 2007
, 13:07, March 31, 2007impartiality good, bias bad
:::Thanks for the answer. You mentioned Wikipedia's race and intelligence article series, with a stress on objectivity, impartiality, and balance. Isn't the object of Conservapedia to avoid that kind of [[Differences_with_Wikipedia|wikipedian]] liberal bias?
:::Thanks for the answer. You mentioned Wikipedia's race and intelligence article series, with a stress on objectivity, impartiality, and balance. Isn't the object of Conservapedia to avoid that kind of [[Differences_with_Wikipedia|wikipedian]] liberal bias?
:::[[User:BillyBoy|BillyBoy]] 08:58, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
:::[[User:BillyBoy|BillyBoy]] 08:58, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
The irony of you tarring everyone with one brush ...
That particular article series is well-done. I had a lot to do with it. "Impartiality" is not [[liberal bias]]. Pretending to be impartial while cherry-picking sources that support your own POV is the problem. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT)