Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + + +
"a view that was expressly intended to take God out of the picture of creation"
The '''Naturalistic evolution''' theory (or '''unguided evolution''') posits the view that new species of life came into being as a result of [[natural causes]] only, that is, without any supernatural intervention (compare [[Creationism]]). Put this way, it makes a crucial distinction between the more general or vague formulations espoused by proponents of Evolution.
The '''Naturalistic evolution''' theory (or '''unguided evolution''') posits the view that new species of life came into being as a result of [[natural causes]] only, that is, without any supernatural intervention (compare [[Creationism]]). Thus it is "a view that was expressly intended to take God out of the picture of [[creation]]"<ref>Christian author Glenn S. Sunshine wrote, "scientists can simultaneously accept undirected evolution—a view that was expressly intended to take God out of the picture of creation—and yet believe in God" [https://www.breakpoint.org/features-columns/articles/entry/12/9118] </ref>
* undirected evolution—a view that was expressly intended to take God out of the picture of creation
Put this way, it makes a crucial distinction between the more general or vague formulations espoused by proponents of Evolution.
Evolutionists frequently claim that they are ''not'' atheists or materialists, and even that evolution is compatible with religious faith. However, this claim rests on an ambiguity (most likely a deliberately framed one). The term ''unguided evolution'' cuts through this fog.
Evolutionists frequently claim that they are ''not'' atheists or materialists, and even that evolution is compatible with religious faith. However, this claim rests on an ambiguity (most likely a deliberately framed one). The term ''unguided evolution'' cuts through this fog.