nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 562:
Line 562: − − − − ==What happened to the facts?== − How is D&D marketed towards teenagers and children? I see nothing in the article expressively backing this up, and my research on this topic has led me to believe that this game is essentially the fodder of 30-yr-old 'nerds' in the basement. − − I know this is Conservapedia and all, but there's a difference between telling things with a conservative slant and pulling things out of thin air. Some of the notions presented here are ludicrous. − − The dice section - actually, the odd dice aren't quite necessary; one could do some simple math and discover that the same result could be reached through use of several traditional six-sided die, athough the many-sided option is the most common. − − Under the 'Third Edition' heading, I would like to point out that stating that "...continued to improve the art and graphics of D&D..." implies that not only they changed the artwork associated with the game itself, but also improved the quality of the graphics (as this is a table-top RPG and not a console RPG, all graphics are printed, not rendered. Were this a console RPG, noting improved graphics implies that the ''resolution'' (picture quality/detail) had improved.) Thus, the use of the word 'quality' may not be the best choice.
Talk:Dungeons and Dragons (view source)
Revision as of 18:53, April 22, 2010
, 18:53, April 22, 2010Reverted edits by Stawberriegummi (Talk) to last revision by Jpatt
Hmm. Okay, fair enough. I'll try to rewrite that section, and see if I can't come up with a version that will be acceptable to all parties concerned. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:05, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
Hmm. Okay, fair enough. I'll try to rewrite that section, and see if I can't come up with a version that will be acceptable to all parties concerned. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:05, 26 June 2008 (EDT)