Changes

:Second—I clearly explained my edit, Anne Coulter is not an appropriate source for the agenda of the ACLU—she is a fine source for her interpretation of the agenda of the ACLU—she is even a reasonable source for the objections some (but not all) conservatives have to the ACLU—but she is not an appropriate source as used.  (And therefore my edit was completely in line with this site’s requirements).

:Second—I clearly explained my edit, Anne Coulter is not an appropriate source for the agenda of the ACLU—she is a fine source for her interpretation of the agenda of the ACLU—she is even a reasonable source for the objections some (but not all) conservatives have to the ACLU—but she is not an appropriate source as used.  (And therefore my edit was completely in line with this site’s requirements).

:Third—your edit was in violation of this site’s rules, it made an untrue and unverifiable claim—if you can find one place where the ACLU actually claims that the Constitution has a “sodomy clause” I will gladly apologize, but until then, claims that they say the Constitution has such a clause do not belong on this site.  (If you really want to criticize the ACLU there is plenty to criticize them for without making false accusations and you should feel free to do that).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

:Third—your edit was in violation of this site’s rules, it made an untrue and unverifiable claim—if you can find one place where the ACLU actually claims that the Constitution has a “sodomy clause” I will gladly apologize, but until then, claims that they say the Constitution has such a clause do not belong on this site.  (If you really want to criticize the ACLU there is plenty to criticize them for without making false accusations and you should feel free to do that).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)