Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

United States v. Wheeler (view source)

Revision as of 13:52, May 2, 2010

129 bytes removed ,  13:52, May 2, 2010
m
Reverted edits by KurtCobain (Talk) to last revision by Joaquín Martínez
Line 1: Line 1:  
In '''''United States v. Wheeler''''', 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is "inherent", which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes.
 
In '''''United States v. Wheeler''''', 435 U.S. 313, 323-324 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes have a sovereign right that is "inherent", which includes the right to prosecute tribal members for crimes.
   −
This power, hoBroken heart and broken bones
+
This power, however, is not immune to abrogation by Congress.  ''Id.'' at 323 ("the sufferance of Congress").
−
Think of how a castrated horse feels
  −
One more quirky cliche'd phrase
  −
You're the one I wanna refill
  −
wever, is not immune to abrogation by Congress.  ''Id.'' at 323 ("the sufferance of Congress").
   
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:Indian Law]]
 
[[category:Indian Law]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/774634"

Navigation menu