| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | #use a [[double standard]]: racial remarks by liberals (e.g., [[Joe Biden]] or [[Hillary Clinton]]) are just fine, but extreme abuse greets any conservative for that | | #use a [[double standard]]: racial remarks by liberals (e.g., [[Joe Biden]] or [[Hillary Clinton]]) are just fine, but extreme abuse greets any conservative for that |
| | #insist that theories a liberal likes (e.g., [[evolution]], man-made [[global warming]]) are somehow ''objective'' and indisputable, while principles a liberal dislikes (e.g., [[conservatism]]) are ''subjective'' | | #insist that theories a liberal likes (e.g., [[evolution]], man-made [[global warming]]) are somehow ''objective'' and indisputable, while principles a liberal dislikes (e.g., [[conservatism]]) are ''subjective'' |
| | + | #unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement |
| | | | |
| | Liberal style also includes these additional characteristics: | | Liberal style also includes these additional characteristics: |
| Line 35: |
Line 36: |
| | #attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true | | #attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true |
| | #overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] | | #overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] |
| − | #unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement
| |
| | #denial of accountability | | #denial of accountability |
| | #believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office | | #believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office |