Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: − + Line 17:
Line 17: + + + +
→Offensive?: feigned offense is used as a tool of censorship. Often the offense is fictional
:Conservapedia is not a dumping ground for liberal and atheist apologetics and excuses. If readers ''really'' want that, they can head on over to wikipedia and drink their fill. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 22:46, 26 February 2010 (EST
:Conservapedia is not a dumping ground for liberal and atheist apologetics and excuses. If readers ''really'' want that, they can head on over to wikipedia and drink their fill. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 22:46, 26 February 2010 (EST
==Defamation==
==Offensive?==
Does it not occur to anyone that to suggest that to suggest that atheists are more likely to kill masses of people is offensive? Hitler was a very sick man, and everyone knows that, but it doesn't mean that every atheist is as sick as that. It is also constantly asserted that to disagree with this article means that the person disagreeing is automatically dumping their liberal agenda. There are plenty of religious liberal persons, as there are non-religious conservatives.
Does it not occur to anyone that to suggest that to suggest that atheists are more likely to kill masses of people is offensive? Hitler was a very sick man, and everyone knows that, but it doesn't mean that every atheist is as sick as that. It is also constantly asserted that to disagree with this article means that the person disagreeing is automatically dumping their liberal agenda. There are plenty of religious liberal persons, as there are non-religious conservatives.
:We don't care if atheists are offended. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:32, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
:We don't care if atheists are offended. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:32, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
Why not?
Why not?
:Because the truth (and forgiveness) is a more important value than speculation about whether someone may be offended by it.
:Also, feigned offense is used as a tool of [[censorship]]. Often the offense is fictional.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:03, 13 May 2010 (EDT)