Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:  
::::I think what FrankC is saying is trying to say is that, despite the title, the article is not Krugman accusing Obama.[[User:DrRaymondL|DrRaymondL]] 14:50, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
 
::::I think what FrankC is saying is trying to say is that, despite the title, the article is not Krugman accusing Obama.[[User:DrRaymondL|DrRaymondL]] 14:50, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
 
:::::Oh, you mean the ''New York Times'' is not a Reliable Source?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]]
 
:::::Oh, you mean the ''New York Times'' is not a Reliable Source?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]]
 +
::::::I see that RobSmith has readded the Krugman blurb despite being shown that Krugman does not believe that the Oil Spill is Obama's fault. Prior revisions were reworded to show the actual context of the article but RobSmith reverted that also. Can we get a final ruling from perhaps Mr. Schlafly on this because this is just plain deceitful. I don't even see why Krugman's opinion is even relevant considering the plethora of evidence in the article that shows Obama's poor response.[[User:Ameda|ameda]] 19:42, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
124

edits

Navigation menu