| Line 39: |
Line 39: |
| | # Lack of any demonstrable vestigial parts of the human [[genome]]. While evolutionists often claim that regions of the genome are "junk DNA" and would not have been placed there by a designer, none have actually shown this to be true, and much so-called "junk DNA" has been shown to be useful.<ref>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html</ref> | | # Lack of any demonstrable vestigial parts of the human [[genome]]. While evolutionists often claim that regions of the genome are "junk DNA" and would not have been placed there by a designer, none have actually shown this to be true, and much so-called "junk DNA" has been shown to be useful.<ref>http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html</ref> |
| | # While evolutionists argue that there are examples of "[[argument from poor design|bad design]]" in the bodies of many organisms, such as "flaws" in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things! The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one. | | # While evolutionists argue that there are examples of "[[argument from poor design|bad design]]" in the bodies of many organisms, such as "flaws" in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things! The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one. |
| − | <!-- Humans have evolved the best number of teeth. Proof of this is that some people still maintain the wisdom teeth. -->
| + | # We have the perfect number of [[teeth]] to fit in our [[mouth]]s. While creationism perfectly accounts for that result, evolutionism predicts a contrary result: As our [[face]]s evolved from chimpanzee-like faces to human faces, the shortening of the muzzle would have caused the teeth to become overcrowded in the mouth. |
| | # Human fertility is rapidly declining, disproving evolutionary improvement in humans and also suggesting a brief timeline for human existence. | | # Human fertility is rapidly declining, disproving evolutionary improvement in humans and also suggesting a brief timeline for human existence. |
| | | | |
| | ===Missing fossils=== | | ===Missing fossils=== |
| − | <!-- This is a blatant lie. -->
| + | # the remarkable whale, which is a mammal, has no plausible evolutionary ancestor |
| − | <!-- That is the definition of a transitional form! One animal that is similar to another but not equal! --> | + | # No transitional forms appear for horses, instead different horse like animals appear in the fossil record distinct<ref>Ray comfort, forward to the 150th anniversary edition of On the Origin of Species</ref> |
| | # the enormous gaps and lack of intermediate species in the [[fossils|fossil]] record. | | # the enormous gaps and lack of intermediate species in the [[fossils|fossil]] record. |
| − | # No clear transition from unicellular to multicellular organisms. <!-- This SHOULD be removed as it does not disprove evolution, it merely shows that unicellular and simple unicellular organisms do not produce many fossils. --> | + | # No clear transition from unicellular to multicellular organisms. |
| − | <!-- Look at a corpse. It has no hair, does that mean that the person was bald when they died? NO! --> | + | # Mammalian fur and body hair. There is no known evolutionary pathway for the development of fur, and no fossil evidence of hair evolving from scales, even though it survives very well.<ref>http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_4/Bergman.htm</ref> |
| | # A lack of any evolution from prehistoric forms has been demonstrated for many species. | | # A lack of any evolution from prehistoric forms has been demonstrated for many species. |
| | | | |