Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate: Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)? (view source)

Revision as of 05:22, May 17, 2010

270 bytes added ,  05:22, May 17, 2010
Many would disagree with your statement, but it is beside the point. More energy means a longer healthy lifespan for the people.
Line 14: Line 14:     
Could you please further explain your stance on this issue? -MPC, 12:00, 16 May 2010
 
Could you please further explain your stance on this issue? -MPC, 12:00, 16 May 2010
 +
 +
:: Reply to new comment (comment above was changed after thread below formed).  Many would disagree with your statement, but it is beside the point.  More energy means a longer healthy lifespan for the people.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:22, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
    
: It's simple:  the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan.  Why?  Because energy production creates wealth that can then improve health-related facilities like hospitals, and energy use provides comfort.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:39, 16 May 2010 (EDT)
 
: It's simple:  the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan.  Why?  Because energy production creates wealth that can then improve health-related facilities like hospitals, and energy use provides comfort.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:39, 16 May 2010 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,372

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/778904"

Navigation menu