Changes

Debate: Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)? (view source)

Revision as of 22:05, May 17, 2010

474 bytes added , 22:05, May 17, 2010

I suggest those opposed to energy consumption and use try living in some of the nations have less per-capita energy, and seeing how life is shorter there

Line 8: Line 8:

:: I am thoroughly not an environmentalist, however I am ecologically conscious, and I would argue a difference. That said, I do think God would appreciate our caring of the planet more than our endless need for consumption. I would rather the planet exist for longer, even if God has the power to cut it short instantly. [[User:ColinS|ColinS]] 17:49, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

+

::: "Consumption" runs the gamut from life-promoting energy use to unjustifiable destruction of the environment. Since virtually everyone opposes senseless waste, the real debate is about energy use, and I favor it because it extends lives and saves lives. I suggest those opposed to energy consumption and use try living in some of the nations have less per-capita energy, and seeing how life is shorter there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:05, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

'''YES'''

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,372

edits

Changes

Debate: Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)? (view source)

Revision as of 22:05, May 17, 2010

Navigation menu

Search