Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:  
*Still, Conservapedia's article creates the impression that Paul Krugman thinks that the oil spill was Obama's fault. That's false, and it should be corrected.
 
*Still, Conservapedia's article creates the impression that Paul Krugman thinks that the oil spill was Obama's fault. That's false, and it should be corrected.
 
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:56, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
 
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:56, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
 +
::Let me start by sayind, don't worry, I'm not going to delete the reference in the article, I've learned my lesson and I'm sure there is a civil way we can resolve this. FrankC, I'd like to give Rob the benefit of the doubt and assume he simply did not have enough time to fully read the article, especially since he's the admin here. It is true, however, that in it's first sentence the article makes Krugman's opinion clear, that he does not believe what the title says. Therefore, I really do feel that either the reference should be changed to include Krugman's view, or, more preferably, simply deleted (why, after all, should someone reading this article be sent to someone trying to claim Obama is innocent?) Thanks, and hopefully we can come to a resolution everyone agrees on.[[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 09:05, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
146

edits

Navigation menu