Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 74: Line 74:  
::BTW, what do you think of the three basic properties of a counterexample which I mentioned above?
 
::BTW, what do you think of the three basic properties of a counterexample which I mentioned above?
 
::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:45, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
 
::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:45, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Well, then, the freshwater lakes that were not formed by the (implausible) "ice age" theory serve as a counterexample.
 +
 +
::: As to your suggestion of three basis properties of a counterexample, I comment on each here:
 +
 +
::::1.  it should not be easily - or even obviously - be reconciled or explained within the theory of an Old Earth.
 +
 +
:::::This would work if you include a requirement of plausibility.
 +
 +
::::2. it should be at least as well be explained within the concurring theory of a Young Earth and finally:
 +
 +
:::::No, this is not required, but illustrates a basic flaw in Old-Earth-thinking.  Do you think mathematicians accept the validity of a hypothesis as long as no competing hypothesis has been proven?  Of course not.
 +
 +
::::3. the negation of the counterexample should be even more obviously and more easily be reconciled or explained within the theory of an Old Earth.
 +
 +
:::::This is incoherent, but illustrates the contorted logic of Old-Earth advocates.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:39, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
    
=== The existence of inland saltwater lakes, such as Mono Lake and the Great Salt Lake, suggest a recent global flood ===
 
=== The existence of inland saltwater lakes, such as Mono Lake and the Great Salt Lake, suggest a recent global flood ===
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795

edits

Navigation menu