Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
234 bytes added ,  21:05, March 31, 2007
Line 20: Line 20:     
I note that the entire section I wrote about the non-religious sources of morality, which included solid references, has simply been cut. I have it saved, or somebody who has access to this now-locked article can simply revert to it. What is the point in putting in well-researched material if it is permissible to over-write it with what looks to me like a gigantic copy-and-paste job of copyrighted material - a tad ironic in an article about morality, don't you think? [[User:Britinme|Britinme]]16:23 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I note that the entire section I wrote about the non-religious sources of morality, which included solid references, has simply been cut. I have it saved, or somebody who has access to this now-locked article can simply revert to it. What is the point in putting in well-researched material if it is permissible to over-write it with what looks to me like a gigantic copy-and-paste job of copyrighted material - a tad ironic in an article about morality, don't you think? [[User:Britinme|Britinme]]16:23 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yes, a revert to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Morality&oldid=74537 this version] would be the best thing. The current version is really just a copy-paste gig. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:05, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
1,767

edits

Navigation menu