22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
I disagree
This is an interesting term but I think calling out specific groups as having this trait (i.e. evolutionists and global warming advocates) is unncessary. It is a blank cheque for any group to apply to anyone who disagrees; Young earthers versus old earthers; Evolutionists versus intelligent design; Agnostics versus any diety based religion. This "encylopedia" article serves nothing but to offer a backhanded critizism.
This is an interesting term but I think calling out specific groups as having this trait (i.e. evolutionists and global warming advocates) is unncessary. It is a blank cheque for any group to apply to anyone who disagrees; Young earthers versus old earthers; Evolutionists versus intelligent design; Agnostics versus any diety based religion. This "encylopedia" article serves nothing but to offer a backhanded critizism.
:If you don't think evolutionists use confirmation bias, I suggest you look at some of the works of [[Richard Dawkins]] and others like him. As for the global warmists, didn't you hear about the scandal from the Climate Research Unit? [[User:PatrickP|PatrickP]] 20:15, 18 May 2010 (EDT)