146
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + +
Talk:Gulf of Mexico oil spill (view source)
Revision as of 04:35, May 19, 2010
, 04:35, May 19, 2010→Drilling: new section
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:56, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
:[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 08:56, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
::Let me start by saying, don't worry, I'm not going to delete the reference in the article, I've learned my lesson and I'm sure there is a civil way we can resolve this. FrankC, I'd like to give Rob the benefit of the doubt and assume he simply did not have enough time to fully read the article, especially since he's the admin here. It is true, however, that in it's first sentence the article makes Krugman's opinion clear, that he does not believe what the title says. Therefore, I really do feel that either the reference should be changed to include Krugman's view, or, more preferably, simply deleted (why, after all, should someone reading this article be sent to someone trying to claim Obama is innocent?) Thanks, and hopefully we can come to a resolution everyone agrees on.[[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 09:05, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
::Let me start by saying, don't worry, I'm not going to delete the reference in the article, I've learned my lesson and I'm sure there is a civil way we can resolve this. FrankC, I'd like to give Rob the benefit of the doubt and assume he simply did not have enough time to fully read the article, especially since he's the admin here. It is true, however, that in it's first sentence the article makes Krugman's opinion clear, that he does not believe what the title says. Therefore, I really do feel that either the reference should be changed to include Krugman's view, or, more preferably, simply deleted (why, after all, should someone reading this article be sent to someone trying to claim Obama is innocent?) Thanks, and hopefully we can come to a resolution everyone agrees on.[[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 09:05, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
== Drilling ==
I'm a bit puzzled by one matter in this article, which I really feel needs improvement (I, personally, have reasons to be concerned with this situation, and quite frankly I'm pretty frustrated at the administration's response to it.) However, this article seems to take the stance that oil drilling is bad and that approving drilling was what Obama did wrong. Considering that drilling is what will help us get off of foreign oil and is considered good on most other Conservapedia articles, this article could certainly benefit from shifting Obama's error from approving drilling to failing to respond, since, as of now, the article simply seems hypocritical. [[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 00:35, 19 May 2010 (EDT)