25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + + + + + + + +
→Is "Obamanomics" really anything new?
:Actually it seems like it may actually be a term that people use. (I tend to to think that a purported encyclopedia should refrain from inventing terms.) Perhaps it's worth having a page about this one after all. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 16:28, 19 May 2010 (EDT)
:Actually it seems like it may actually be a term that people use. (I tend to to think that a purported encyclopedia should refrain from inventing terms.) Perhaps it's worth having a page about this one after all. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 16:28, 19 May 2010 (EDT)
Keynes embraced tax cuts. Obama embraces tax increases to account for for his increases in spending under PAYGO. However, the Obama administration fails to account for decreases in the activity being taxed, which would decrease revenues.
Obama is no Keynesian.
(An argument could be made that Reagan actually was a Keynesian, but that's a discussion for another day).
[[User:Soho|Soho]] 15:28, 20 May 2010 (EDT)