Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 68:
Line 68: − +
Reverted edits by ToryUtopian (Talk) to last revision by Ameda
== Logical Conclusion ==
== Logical Conclusion ==
As scientific theories require that their laws be immutable, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule. Thus, if evolution fails to account for any one of these items (or countless others), it must be discarded. However, the whole point of scientific theory is to account for and explain all phenomena, resulting in laws being immutable only until proven false, and none of these examples are seen as valid by evolutionary experts.
As scientific theories require that their laws be immutable, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule. Thus, if evolution fails to account for any one of these items (or countless others), it must be discarded.
{{evolution}}
{{evolution}}