1,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
Sorry, Ben, but I really couldn't care less about your beliefs (or anyone else's, so long as they don't try to force their views on me). Now, if you'd rather state that "there is a policy", that's better and more authoritative (for note, use of the term "belief" implies uncertainty on your part, and I would hope that an admin is certain of the site rules). And I would hardly count correcting an incorrect edit as an "edit war," especially seeing as that's exactly what the purpose of this site is, if I recall the purpose statement and Andy's interviews correctly. --[[User:JohnS001|JohnS001]] 13:26, 22 May 2010 (EDT)
Sorry, Ben, but I really couldn't care less about your beliefs (or anyone else's, so long as they don't try to force their views on me). Now, if you'd rather state that "there is a policy", that's better and more authoritative (for note, use of the term "belief" implies uncertainty on your part, and I would hope that an admin is certain of the site rules). And I would hardly count correcting an incorrect edit as an "edit war," especially seeing as that's exactly what the purpose of this site is, if I recall the purpose statement and Andy's interviews correctly. --[[User:JohnS001|JohnS001]] 13:26, 22 May 2010 (EDT)
The "edit war" is what we call it when you repeatedly make a change after you've been reverted by an admin. The particular edit war I was referring to was on the great wall page with Karajou. However, I'll refrain from reverting your edit again because honesty I stepped slightly out of line in dealing with it in the first place, I should have left it to Karajou. However, please refrain from engaging in such edit warring in the future. Thanks.--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 19:48, 22 May 2010 (EDT)