Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Great satire!
Line 6: Line 6:  
so.. are you writing this for google algorithm. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no one is going to search for Dawkins and Machismo. May be you should clear your cache and search it, because when I do that, your page is not even in the top 10. I don't understand what you aim to say by 11900 results for Dawkins and cowardice. conservative and cowardice brings up 287000 results. does that mean anything? I am not sure why you are so much obsessed  about Richard Dawkins' manhood. Shouldn't you be trying to refute his arguments in that precious time? --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 20:24, 23 May 2010 (EDT)
 
so.. are you writing this for google algorithm. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no one is going to search for Dawkins and Machismo. May be you should clear your cache and search it, because when I do that, your page is not even in the top 10. I don't understand what you aim to say by 11900 results for Dawkins and cowardice. conservative and cowardice brings up 287000 results. does that mean anything? I am not sure why you are so much obsessed  about Richard Dawkins' manhood. Shouldn't you be trying to refute his arguments in that precious time? --[[User:Johntalbot|Johntalbot]] 20:24, 23 May 2010 (EDT)
 
::::I guess you need to take some reading comprehension classes.  I did indicate that I didn't believe there were going to be many searches for the term Dawkins and machismo.  I also noticed you also didn't answer my questions.  I will return the favor and not answer yours.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:57, 23 May 2010 (EDT)
 
::::I guess you need to take some reading comprehension classes.  I did indicate that I didn't believe there were going to be many searches for the term Dawkins and machismo.  I also noticed you also didn't answer my questions.  I will return the favor and not answer yours.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:57, 23 May 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
I was given a link to this essay on youtube, and I can say that it certainly hits the target!  Dawkins is well know for being a coward with regards to avoid all debate with those who don't agree with his worldview, so this kind of hard-hitting satire suits him perfectly!  Keep up the good work Mr Conservative, sadly it's no surprise that the the liberal 'Dawkins Defenders' do nothing but criticize anything that exposes their evolutionist leaders for the frauds that they are. - Andrew.
1

edit

Navigation menu