Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 55: Line 55:     
::Also, this is a talk page.  Mager shared a good point, and there is no reason to fire back at him with sarcastic remarks questioning his loyalties to this online encyclopedia.  Also, I'm not sure how the age of Mager's account correlates to him being able to find possible errors or things to improve on.  Finally, I would like to note that you, Jacob, did nothing to respond to Mager's critiques.  Maybe Conservapedia will be able to gain more popularity if the "Talk" page becomes a dialogue in which ideas are tested and questioned rather than a place of dogma.  Would you like me to defend myself from being blocked in advance?  I'm accusing you of being dogmatic because you make no reference to Mager's points in your response.  You solely state that the fact that moral depravity and atheism are inherently linked is true, and any suggestion to the contrary is false.  Instead of blocking me, please consider responding to Mager's or my arguments to promote dialogue on the "Talk" page. -AlexanderMonroe
 
::Also, this is a talk page.  Mager shared a good point, and there is no reason to fire back at him with sarcastic remarks questioning his loyalties to this online encyclopedia.  Also, I'm not sure how the age of Mager's account correlates to him being able to find possible errors or things to improve on.  Finally, I would like to note that you, Jacob, did nothing to respond to Mager's critiques.  Maybe Conservapedia will be able to gain more popularity if the "Talk" page becomes a dialogue in which ideas are tested and questioned rather than a place of dogma.  Would you like me to defend myself from being blocked in advance?  I'm accusing you of being dogmatic because you make no reference to Mager's points in your response.  You solely state that the fact that moral depravity and atheism are inherently linked is true, and any suggestion to the contrary is false.  Instead of blocking me, please consider responding to Mager's or my arguments to promote dialogue on the "Talk" page. -AlexanderMonroe
 +
:::::The atheist the Marque De Sade had no feelings of empathy.  Secondly, I don't think you convincingly showed that mere feelings (which certainly can include mere sentimentality ) is something you can build morality on.  Stalin had feelings.  Unfortunately, his feelings often involved lust for power and envy.  Third, the atheists certainly don't have a good track record when it comes to charity and mass murder.  Apparently, there are a lot of hard hearted atheists and the feelings thing isn't cutting the mustard. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:42, 26 May 2010 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,089

edits

Navigation menu