Changes

:How can Wikipedia have a liberal bias?  Anyone can edit it and biased opinions are scrupulously edited out.  Conservapedia is not based on the principles of balanced scrutiny or honesty like Wikipedia is; it is just a place where conservatives can blast their misinformed opinions at other conservatives.  This is just like the pouty consevatives that run this country; if people dismiss their ridiculous anti-scientific, intolerant garbage, they whine about their critics being anti-Christian and go cry to the religious right.  Can any one of you name even one example of Wikipedia being biased? (note that being secular and listening to opinions outside America is not bias!)   

:How can Wikipedia have a liberal bias?  Anyone can edit it and biased opinions are scrupulously edited out.  Conservapedia is not based on the principles of balanced scrutiny or honesty like Wikipedia is; it is just a place where conservatives can blast their misinformed opinions at other conservatives.  This is just like the pouty consevatives that run this country; if people dismiss their ridiculous anti-scientific, intolerant garbage, they whine about their critics being anti-Christian and go cry to the religious right.  Can any one of you name even one example of Wikipedia being biased? (note that being secular and listening to opinions outside America is not bias!)   

No i contest that Conservapedia fair and balanced becuse unlike Conservapedia wikipedia is NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN ANTI AMERICAN OR LIBRIAL BUT INSTED IT TREATES ALL VEIWS EQUALLY AND I FIND ON THE CONTARY THAT THIS SITE IS BIASED AND TOO CHRISTIAN CENTERD AND ALSO I FIND THIS SITE OVERLY RESTRICTIVE ON LIBIRAL,REAL SCIENTIFIC AND NON CHRISTIAN VIEWS I ''DEFIENITLY PREFIER WIKIPEDIA FOR REFRENCE''.

No i contest that Conservapedia fair and balanced becuse unlike Conservapedia wikipedia is NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN ANTI AMERICAN OR LIBRIAL BUT INSTED IT TREATES ALL VEIWS EQUALLY AND I FIND ON THE CONTARY THAT THIS SITE IS BIASED AND TOO CHRISTIAN CENTERD AND ALSO I FIND THIS SITE OVERLY RESTRICTIVE ON LIBIRAL,REAL SCIENTIFIC AND NON CHRISTIAN VIEWS I ''DEFIENITLY PREFIER WIKIPEDIA FOR REFRENCE''. Note: this unsigned opinion was provided by someone with common sense.

Obviously.  This is an idea whose time has come.  I, for one, am sick and tired of the liberal bias in the media and online in Wikipedia.  This project is still young and the criticism and mockery of it by leftists in the blogosphere is getting old.  I pledge as a new editor to do what I can to help make Conservapedia the premier online encyclopedia it is destined to become.

Obviously.  This is an idea whose time has come.  I, for one, am sick and tired of the liberal bias in the media and online in Wikipedia.  This project is still young and the criticism and mockery of it by leftists in the blogosphere is getting old.  I pledge as a new editor to do what I can to help make Conservapedia the premier online encyclopedia it is destined to become.