7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − The '''censorability''' of a concept, movement or ideology is its vulnerability of being censored by its opponents.+ − − '''Censorability''' can be quantified on a scale from "0" to "1", where "0" reflects an ideology that can completely withstand efforts to censor it, while "1" indicates easy suppression through [[censorship]]. A perfect score for censorability is "0", reflecting maximum strength. − − The score is dependent in part on how the ideology or movement is expressed. For example, if a unique statement or outward sign is required as an essential part of the ideology, then it will have higher censorability than if its articulation is varied. − − Ideologies can be rated for relative censorability as an indication of long-term strength. − − Over time, movements that are relatively difficult to censor -- i.e., have a low censorability -- can thrive. An example is the [[pro-life]] movement: it has virtually a perfect "0" degree of censorability. − − {| class="wikitable sortable" − |- − − − − |- − |Christianity − |0.5 − |Dimwitted censorship of Christian references often occurs − |- − |[[Pro-Life]] − |0 − |Virtually impossible to censor. − |- − |[[Atheism]] − |0.2 − |Many do not quickly recognize its forms. − |- − |[[Homosexual agenda]] − |0.3 − |By claiming that criticism of immoral and unhealthy lifestyles is "bigotry," pro-homosexual activists are able to censor critiques of their political agenda. − |- − |}
no edit summary
ASSFLY YOU'RE A F*CKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!! SERIOUSLY. UR AN IDIOT
!Concept or Ideology
!Censorability
!Comments
== Censor-Prone Environments ==
== Censor-Prone Environments ==