Changes

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], [[P.J. Crowley]], and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support<ref> http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref> <ref> http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref>. It appears that [[liberal|liberals]] either have no interest in or have difficulty in reading the law. For this reason, here are the full 16 pages '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' that way liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. It can be read on [[Fox News]] online<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf</ref>, but now, it can be read here too '''word for word''' including in whatever parts of the bill are in caps or not. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, racial profiling. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. Liberals, please read it and educate yourselves.

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], [[P.J. Crowley]], and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support<ref> http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref> <ref> http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref>. It appears that [[liberal|liberals]] either have no interest in or have difficulty in reading the law. For this reason, here are the full 16 pages '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' that way liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. It can be read on [[Fox News]] online<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf</ref>, but now, it can be read here too '''word for word''' including in whatever parts of the bill are in caps or not. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, racial profiling. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of.

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref> http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref> <ref> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref> http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref> <ref> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

==References==

==References==

<references />

<references />