Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)

Revision as of 15:10, June 1, 2010

159 bytes added ,  15:10, June 1, 2010
→‎Lakes again: There are large freshwater lakes near the Equator. Do you think an "Ice Age" formed them also?
Line 124: Line 124:     
*It was repeatedly explained why the ''Great Lakes'' are no countexample to an Old Earth.
 
*It was repeatedly explained why the ''Great Lakes'' are no countexample to an Old Earth.
−
*Aschlafly concluded: ''Well, then, the freshwater lakes that were not formed by the (implausible) "ice age" theory serve as a counterexample.''
+
*Aschlafly concluded: ''Well, then, the freshwater lakes that were not formed by the (implausible) "ice age" theory serve as a counterexample."''
 
*Aschlafly, could you reformulate the ''counterexample'' in question? Thanks.
 
*Aschlafly, could you reformulate the ''counterexample'' in question? Thanks.
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 10:49, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 10:49, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: There are large freshwater lakes near the Equator.  Do you think an "Ice Age" formed them also?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:10, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
    
== Implausibility of the Ice Age Theory ==
 
== Implausibility of the Ice Age Theory ==
    
What's implausible about it? The article [[Ice Age]] doesn't say anything about plausibility. [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 10:51, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
 
What's implausible about it? The article [[Ice Age]] doesn't say anything about plausibility. [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 10:51, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/783950"

Navigation menu