3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 157:
Line 157: + + + + + + +
→mtDNA
Respect!
Respect!
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]
Question from WilliamDoor:
Since we now know that Neandertal did NOT in fact have human DNA, that it diverges from human genes quite a bit (although no doubt there are similarities), WHY is this not mentioned in the article? By DNA evidence Neandertal is NOT simply homo sapiens but with fat skeletons as claimed by creationists. Why is this not in the article?
Oh wait, I know why... "Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable. USERS RELY ON INFORMATION HERE ENTIRELY AT THEIR OWN RISK. Conservapedia and its editors, contributors, sponsors, affiliates or anyone associated in any way with this project cannot guarantee the validity of any information found here, and shall not be responsible or liable in any way for any inaccurate or libelous information found here. Content of any given article may have been vandalized or modified by someone who lacks knowledge. "
==Logic==
==Logic==