Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
"Logically possible but physically impossible" is not a claim I'm entirely comfortable with. This certainly provides food for thought!
Line 33: Line 33:     
:Spewing forth abstruse, incomprehensible symbols is not in line with our goals here. If you have a craving to speak the language of higher mathematics - but lack the willingness to make your points accessible to high school kids - then Wikipedia might be a more congenial place for you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:19, 8 January 2010 (EST)
 
:Spewing forth abstruse, incomprehensible symbols is not in line with our goals here. If you have a craving to speak the language of higher mathematics - but lack the willingness to make your points accessible to high school kids - then Wikipedia might be a more congenial place for you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:19, 8 January 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
== Physically impossible? ==
 +
 +
Your edit is well-taken, Jacob, but I'm not so sure this impossible after all.  "Logically possible but physically impossible" is not a claim I'm entirely comfortable with.  This certainly provides food for thought!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:01, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Navigation menu