768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + +
→Why Conservapedia need to include the "mainstream" view of evolution... somewhere.
I find this to be such a useful statement that I am going to steal it for reprint on my page.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 21:31, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
I find this to be such a useful statement that I am going to steal it for reprint on my page.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 21:31, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
:I would endorse this view, Dpbsmith. In order to understand the theory itself and it's criticism, people need to be presented with an actual view of what the theory of evolution actually states, and draw their own conclusions (though most will probably come here with preconcieved notions). My $0.02. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
:I would endorse this view, Dpbsmith. In order to understand the theory itself and it's criticism, people need to be presented with an actual view of what the theory of evolution actually states, and draw their own conclusions (though most will probably come here with preconcieved notions). My $0.02. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
I entered a submission to the panel. I linked to this argument, AmesG's petition, and Hoji's alternative language. The ball needed to start rolling on this. Feel free to add to the petition [[Conservapedia:Panel/Submit]][[User:Myk|Myk]] 22:32, 31 March 2007 (EDT)